Libya vs Suriname: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Libya
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 218.14 t against 187.55 t in Libya, a difference of 30.59 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 72nd and Suriname ranks 70th of 189 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,954 t | 25.66 t | 1,928 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 670.75 t | 35.87 t | 634.89 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 93.98 t | 82.88 t | 11.1 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Libya or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 218.14 t against 187.55 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Libya and Suriname?
- 30.59 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Suriname?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Suriname rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Libya ranks 72nd and Suriname ranks 70th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf