Lithuania vs Mexico: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Lithuania
- Mexico
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 88.8 t against 86.11 t in Mexico, a difference of 2.69 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 87th and Mexico ranks 88th of 175 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,752 t | 369.14 t | 3,383 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 1,174 t | 404.98 t | 769.27 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 595.02 t | 63.88 t | 531.14 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Lithuania or Mexico?
- Lithuania, at 88.8 t against 86.11 t in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Lithuania and Mexico?
- 2.69 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mexico?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Lithuania and Mexico rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Lithuania ranks 87th and Mexico ranks 88th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf