Malta vs Saint Lucia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Malta
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.13 t against 0.06 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.07 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.2 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Malta ranks 177th and Saint Lucia ranks 179th of 189 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.41 t | 11.58 t | 7.83 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.63 t | 0.04 t | 0.59 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Malta or Saint Lucia?
- Malta, at 0.13 t against 0.06 t in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Malta and Saint Lucia?
- 0.07 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saint Lucia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Saint Lucia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Malta ranks 177th and Saint Lucia ranks 179th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf