Mongolia vs Switzerland: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Mongolia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 420 t against 297.69 t in Switzerland, a difference of 122.31 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Switzerland's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 60th and Switzerland ranks 63rd of 189 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.99 t | 4,316 t | 4,313 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 140.03 t | 526.01 t | 385.98 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Mongolia or Switzerland?
- Mongolia, at 420 t against 297.69 t in Switzerland as of 2016.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Mongolia and Switzerland?
- 122.31 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Switzerland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Switzerland rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Mongolia ranks 60th and Switzerland ranks 63rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf