Myanmar vs Türkiye: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Myanmar
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 49.55 t against 43.44 t in Myanmar, a difference of 6.11 t.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 107th and Türkiye ranks 104th of 189 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 482.21 t | 36.11 t | 446.1 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 4,801 t | 2,402 t | 2,398 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 7,383 t | 32.1 t | 7,351 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Myanmar or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 49.55 t against 43.44 t in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Myanmar and Türkiye?
- 6.11 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Türkiye?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Türkiye rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Myanmar ranks 107th and Türkiye ranks 104th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf