Poland vs Slovenia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Poland
- Slovenia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 625.68 t against 554.38 t in Slovenia, a difference of 71.3 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Slovenia ahead.
Poland ranks 57th and Slovenia ranks 59th of 189 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,764 t | 1,195 t | 4,569 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 2,078 t | 841.65 t | 1,236 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 1,388 t | 787.04 t | 601.07 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Poland or Slovenia?
- Poland, at 625.68 t against 554.38 t in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Poland and Slovenia?
- 71.3 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Slovenia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Slovenia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Poland ranks 57th and Slovenia ranks 59th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf