Türkiye vs Viet Nam: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Türkiye
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 231.63 t against 49.55 t in Türkiye, a difference of 182.08 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 4.7 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Türkiye ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 13 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Türkiye | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.11 t | 2,488 t | 2,452 t | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 2,658 t | 4,674 t | 2,016 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 40.9 t | 355.76 t | 314.86 t | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Türkiye or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 231.63 t against 49.55 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Türkiye and Viet Nam?
- 182.08 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Viet Nam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Türkiye and Viet Nam rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Türkiye ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 13 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf