Cameroon vs Guinea: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Cameroon
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.1 1000 USD against 0.08 1000 USD in Cameroon, a difference of 0.02 1000 USD.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 186th and Guinea ranks 183rd of 189 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 309.32 1000 USD | 92.67 1000 USD | 216.65 1000 USD | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 212.61 1000 USD | 14.48 1000 USD | 198.13 1000 USD | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Cameroon or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 0.1 1000 USD against 0.08 1000 USD in Cameroon as of 2021.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Cameroon and Guinea?
- 0.02 1000 USD, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Cameroon and Guinea rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Cameroon ranks 186th and Guinea ranks 183rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf