Canada vs Uruguay: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Canada
- Uruguay
How they compare
Canada currently reports 4,384 1000 USD against 4,183 1000 USD in Uruguay, a difference of 201 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,302 1000 USD | 1,118 1000 USD | 1,184 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2010s | 4,905 1000 USD | 1,589 1000 USD | 3,316 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2020s | 3,035 1000 USD | 4,870 1000 USD | 1,835 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Canada or Uruguay?
- Canada, at 4,384 1000 USD against 4,183 1000 USD in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Canada and Uruguay?
- 201 1000 USD, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Uruguay?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Uruguay rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Canada ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf