Congo vs Hungary: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Congo
30.84 1000 USD
in 2019
Hungary
31.45 1000 USD
in 2024
Congo rank
103rd
Hungary rank
102nd
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Congo
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 31.45 1000 USD against 30.84 1000 USD in Congo, a difference of 0.61 1000 USD.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 103rd and Hungary ranks 102nd of 175 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16 1000 USD | 1,121 1000 USD | 1,105 1000 USD | Hungary |
| 2010s | 50.02 1000 USD | 323.52 1000 USD | 273.5 1000 USD | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Congo or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 31.45 1000 USD against 30.84 1000 USD in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Congo and Hungary?
- 0.61 1000 USD, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hungary?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Hungary rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Congo ranks 103rd and Hungary ranks 102nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf