Congo vs Latvia: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Congo
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 33.22 1000 USD against 30.84 1000 USD in Congo, a difference of 2.38 1000 USD.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Latvia ahead.
Congo ranks 110th and Latvia ranks 108th of 189 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.13 1000 USD | 310.02 1000 USD | 299.89 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 50.02 1000 USD | 24.98 1000 USD | 25.03 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Congo or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 33.22 1000 USD against 30.84 1000 USD in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Congo and Latvia?
- 2.38 1000 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Latvia rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Congo ranks 110th and Latvia ranks 108th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf