Costa Rica vs Cuba: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1,209 1000 USD against 1,116 1000 USD in Cuba, a difference of 93 1000 USD.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 26th and Cuba ranks 27th of 189 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.73 1000 USD | 261.24 1000 USD | 190.5 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 639.14 1000 USD | 563.13 1000 USD | 76.01 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Costa Rica or Cuba?
- Costa Rica, at 1,209 1000 USD against 1,116 1000 USD in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Costa Rica and Cuba?
- 93 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Cuba?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2012.
- How do Costa Rica and Cuba rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 26th and Cuba ranks 27th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf