Cuba vs Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade): Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value

Cuba
1,116 1000 USD
in 2012
Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade)
1,662 1000 USD
in 2024
Cuba rank
27th
Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) rank
25th

Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time

  • Cuba
  • Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade)
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200220132024

How they compare

Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) currently reports 1,662 1000 USD against 1,116 1000 USD in Cuba, a difference of 546 1000 USD.

That makes Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade)'s figure about 1.5 times Cuba's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 27th and Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) ranks 25th of 175 countries.

Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) Difference Ahead
2000s 261.24 1000 USD 7,876 1000 USD 7,615 1000 USD Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 563.13 1000 USD 4,615 1000 USD 4,052 1000 USD Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Cuba or Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade)?
Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade), at 1,662 1000 USD against 1,116 1000 USD in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Cuba and Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade)?
546 1000 USD, with Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2012.
How do Cuba and Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
Cuba ranks 27th and Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade) ranks 25th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade): Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-phosphatic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-value/cuba/northern-europe-excluding-intra-trade/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-phosphatic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-value/cuba/northern-europe-excluding-intra-trade/">Cuba vs Northern Europe (excluding intra-trade): Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
220 places, 3,996 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf