Djibouti vs Uganda: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Djibouti
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 16.29 1000 USD against 13.77 1000 USD in Djibouti, a difference of 2.52 1000 USD.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Uganda ahead.
Djibouti ranks 129th and Uganda ranks 127th of 189 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.26 1000 USD | 279.49 1000 USD | 269.23 1000 USD | Uganda |
| 2020s | 24.55 1000 USD | 294.57 1000 USD | 270.01 1000 USD | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Djibouti or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 16.29 1000 USD against 13.77 1000 USD in Djibouti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Djibouti and Uganda?
- 2.52 1000 USD, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Uganda rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Djibouti ranks 129th and Uganda ranks 127th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf