Ecuador vs Oceania (excluding intra-trade): Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value

Ecuador
1,553 1000 USD
in 2024
Oceania (excluding intra-trade)
2,541 1000 USD
in 2024
Ecuador rank
19th
Oceania (excluding intra-trade) rank
22nd

Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time

  • Ecuador
  • Oceania (excluding intra-trade)
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200220132024

How they compare

Oceania (excluding intra-trade) currently reports 2,541 1000 USD against 1,553 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 988 1000 USD.

That makes Oceania (excluding intra-trade)'s figure about 1.6 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Oceania (excluding intra-trade) ahead.

Ecuador ranks 19th and Oceania (excluding intra-trade) ranks 22nd of 189 countries.

Oceania (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Oceania (excluding intra-trade) Difference Ahead
2000s 1,745 1000 USD 5,976 1000 USD 4,231 1000 USD Oceania (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 1,865 1000 USD 6,118 1000 USD 4,253 1000 USD Oceania (excluding intra-trade)
2020s 652.39 1000 USD 8,279 1000 USD 7,626 1000 USD Oceania (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Ecuador or Oceania (excluding intra-trade)?
Oceania (excluding intra-trade), at 2,541 1000 USD against 1,553 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Ecuador and Oceania (excluding intra-trade)?
988 1000 USD, with Oceania (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Oceania (excluding intra-trade)?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Oceania (excluding intra-trade) rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
Ecuador ranks 19th and Oceania (excluding intra-trade) ranks 22nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Oceania (excluding intra-trade): Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-phosphatic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-value/ecuador/oceania-excluding-intra-trade/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/other-phosphatic-fertilizers-n-e-c-import-value/ecuador/oceania-excluding-intra-trade/">Ecuador vs Oceania (excluding intra-trade): Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
220 places, 3,996 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf