Eswatini vs Kenya: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Kenya
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 623.45 1000 USD against 601.31 1000 USD in Kenya, a difference of 22.14 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 40th and Kenya ranks 42nd of 189 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 395.54 1000 USD | 1,463 1000 USD | 1,067 1000 USD | Kenya |
| 2010s | 629.84 1000 USD | 6,094 1000 USD | 5,465 1000 USD | Kenya |
| 2020s | 441.63 1000 USD | 832.33 1000 USD | 390.7 1000 USD | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Eswatini or Kenya?
- Eswatini, at 623.45 1000 USD against 601.31 1000 USD in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Eswatini and Kenya?
- 22.14 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kenya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Kenya rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 40th and Kenya ranks 42nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf