Finland vs Nepal: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Finland
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 251.95 1000 USD against 248.72 1000 USD in Finland, a difference of 3.23 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 60th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.69 1000 USD | 33.66 1000 USD | 45.03 1000 USD | Finland |
| 2010s | 89.2 1000 USD | 525.77 1000 USD | 436.57 1000 USD | Nepal |
| 2020s | 292.56 1000 USD | 371.98 1000 USD | 79.42 1000 USD | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Finland or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 251.95 1000 USD against 248.72 1000 USD in Finland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Finland and Nepal?
- 3.23 1000 USD, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Nepal?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Finland and Nepal rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Finland ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 60th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf