Guinea-Bissau vs Norway: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 25.65 1000 USD against 24.67 1000 USD in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.98 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Norway ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 116th and Norway ranks 115th of 189 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.085 1000 USD | 9.91 1000 USD | 9.82 1000 USD | Norway |
| 2010s | 17.89 1000 USD | 19.8 1000 USD | 1.92 1000 USD | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Guinea-Bissau or Norway?
- Norway, at 25.65 1000 USD against 24.67 1000 USD in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Guinea-Bissau and Norway?
- 0.98 1000 USD, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Norway?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Norway rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 116th and Norway ranks 115th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf