India vs Senegal: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- India
- Senegal
How they compare
India currently reports 45.64 1000 USD against 43.52 1000 USD in Senegal, a difference of 2.12 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was India ahead.
India ranks 100th and Senegal ranks 102nd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,326 1000 USD | 148.43 1000 USD | 2,178 1000 USD | India |
| 2010s | 1,799 1000 USD | 379.25 1000 USD | 1,419 1000 USD | India |
| 2020s | 23.09 1000 USD | 64.36 1000 USD | 41.27 1000 USD | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, India or Senegal?
- India, at 45.64 1000 USD against 43.52 1000 USD in Senegal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between India and Senegal?
- 2.12 1000 USD, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Senegal?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do India and Senegal rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- India ranks 100th and Senegal ranks 102nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf