Libya vs Peru: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Libya
- Peru
How they compare
Libya currently reports 103.48 1000 USD against 101.19 1000 USD in Peru, a difference of 2.29 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Peru ahead.
Libya ranks 82nd and Peru ranks 83rd of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 219.28 1000 USD | 17.09 1000 USD | 202.19 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2010s | 163.82 1000 USD | 102.55 1000 USD | 61.26 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2020s | 179.71 1000 USD | 550.29 1000 USD | 370.58 1000 USD | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Libya or Peru?
- Libya, at 103.48 1000 USD against 101.19 1000 USD in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Libya and Peru?
- 2.29 1000 USD, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Peru rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Libya ranks 82nd and Peru ranks 83rd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf