Luxembourg vs Romania: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Production

Luxembourg
0 t
in 2024
Romania
0 t
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
9th
Romania rank
9th

Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Production over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Romania
00.20.40.60.81201320182024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Romania, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 9th and Romania ranks 9th of 26 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Romania Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — production, Luxembourg or Romania?
Luxembourg, at 0 t against 0 t in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — production between Luxembourg and Romania?
0 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Romania?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Luxembourg and Romania rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — production?
Luxembourg ranks 9th and Romania ranks 9th of 26 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
26 places, 214 data points, 2006–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf