New Caledonia vs Uzbekistan: Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Production
Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Production over time
- New Caledonia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 10,241 t against 6 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 10,235 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1,706.8 times New Caledonia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 26 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.14 t | 13,763 t | 13,759 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 6.9 t | 11,050 t | 11,043 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — production, New Caledonia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 10,241 t against 6 t in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — production between New Caledonia and Uzbekistan?
- 10,235 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Uzbekistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do New Caledonia and Uzbekistan rank globally for other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — production?
- New Caledonia ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other phosphatic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf