Hungary vs Switzerland: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Hungary
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 2,901 t against 1,760 t in Hungary, a difference of 1,141 t.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.6 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Switzerland ahead.
Hungary ranks 13th and Switzerland ranks 10th of 32 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,651 t | 3,918 t | 2,267 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 1,687 t | 3,078 t | 1,392 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Hungary or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 2,901 t against 1,760 t in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Hungary and Switzerland?
- 1,141 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Switzerland?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Switzerland rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Hungary ranks 13th and Switzerland ranks 10th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf