Iceland vs Mauritius: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Mauritius
49 t
in 2024
Iceland rank
25th
Mauritius rank
22nd
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Iceland
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 49 t against 0 t in Iceland, a difference of 49 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Mauritius ahead.
Iceland ranks 25th and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 32 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 t | 34 t | 33 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 3.25 t | 24 t | 20.75 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Iceland or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 49 t against 0 t in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Iceland and Mauritius?
- 49 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Iceland ranks 25th and Mauritius ranks 22nd of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf