Nicaragua vs Slovakia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use over time
- Nicaragua
- Slovakia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 325 t against 175 t in Slovakia, a difference of 150 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.9 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 19th and Slovakia ranks 20th of 32 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25 t | 112 t | 87 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 16,391 t | 78 t | 16,313 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use, Nicaragua or Slovakia?
- Nicaragua, at 325 t against 175 t in Slovakia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use between Nicaragua and Slovakia?
- 150 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Slovakia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Slovakia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — agricultural use?
- Nicaragua ranks 19th and Slovakia ranks 20th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf