Argentina vs Lithuania: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Argentina
- Lithuania
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 160.08 t against 73.01 t in Lithuania, a difference of 87.07 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 2.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.
Argentina ranks 49th and Lithuania ranks 50th of 91 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.55 t | 866.62 t | 866.08 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 293.12 t | 273.1 t | 20.02 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Argentina or Lithuania?
- Argentina, at 160.08 t against 73.01 t in Lithuania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Argentina and Lithuania?
- 87.07 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Lithuania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
- How do Argentina and Lithuania rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Argentina ranks 49th and Lithuania ranks 50th of 91 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf