Belarus vs Portugal: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Belarus
- Portugal
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2,136 t against 1,861 t in Portugal, a difference of 275 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 22nd and Portugal ranks 25th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 230.2 t | 89.46 t | 140.74 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 73.41 t | 2,051 t | 1,977 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 30,646 t | 631.34 t | 30,015 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Belarus or Portugal?
- Belarus, at 2,136 t against 1,861 t in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Belarus and Portugal?
- 275 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Portugal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Portugal rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Belarus ranks 22nd and Portugal ranks 25th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf