Bulgaria vs Zimbabwe: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Bulgaria
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 44.89 t against 30.74 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 14.15 t.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 98 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 t | 56 t | 51 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 10.31 t | 456.29 t | 445.98 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.86 t | 30.74 t | 27.88 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Bulgaria or Zimbabwe?
- Bulgaria, at 44.89 t against 30.74 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Bulgaria and Zimbabwe?
- 14.15 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
- How do Bulgaria and Zimbabwe rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Bulgaria ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 60th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf