Chile vs Luxembourg: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Chile
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 653.55 t against 353.36 t in Chile, a difference of 300.19 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.8 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Chile ranks 37th and Luxembourg ranks 34th of 98 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,677 t | 366.21 t | 9,310 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 4,672 t | 58.9 t | 4,613 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 7,216 t | 606.17 t | 6,610 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Chile or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 653.55 t against 353.36 t in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Chile and Luxembourg?
- 300.19 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Luxembourg?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Luxembourg rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Chile ranks 37th and Luxembourg ranks 34th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf