Hungary vs Lithuania: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Hungary
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 73.01 t against 66.8 t in Hungary, a difference of 6.21 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.
Hungary ranks 53rd and Lithuania ranks 52nd of 98 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.58 t | 709.4 t | 666.82 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 186.6 t | 706.86 t | 520.26 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 133.58 t | 487.69 t | 354.11 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Hungary or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 73.01 t against 66.8 t in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Hungary and Lithuania?
- 6.21 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Lithuania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Lithuania rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Hungary ranks 53rd and Lithuania ranks 52nd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf