Latvia vs Namibia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 21.12 t against 19.48 t in Latvia, a difference of 1.64 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 67th and Namibia ranks 64th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.58 t | 8.17 t | 2.41 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.84 t | 14.46 t | 12.62 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 33.54 t | 16.81 t | 16.73 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Latvia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 21.12 t against 19.48 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Latvia and Namibia?
- 1.64 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Latvia ranks 67th and Namibia ranks 64th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf