Lebanon vs Singapore: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Lebanon
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 30.51 t against 25 t in Lebanon, a difference of 5.51 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Singapore ahead.
Lebanon ranks 62nd and Singapore ranks 61st of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.02 t | 909.89 t | 908.87 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 10.12 t | 32.56 t | 22.44 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 25 t | 19.36 t | 5.64 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Lebanon or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 30.51 t against 25 t in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Lebanon and Singapore?
- 5.51 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Lebanon and Singapore rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Lebanon ranks 62nd and Singapore ranks 61st of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf