Namibia vs Singapore: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time
- Namibia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 30.51 t against 21.12 t in Namibia, a difference of 9.39 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Namibia ranks 64th and Singapore ranks 61st of 98 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.33 t | 1,711 t | 1,703 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 16.8 t | 45.41 t | 28.61 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 16.81 t | 25.3 t | 8.5 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Namibia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 30.51 t against 21.12 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Namibia and Singapore?
- 9.39 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Singapore?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Singapore rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
- Namibia ranks 64th and Singapore ranks 61st of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf