Slovenia vs Zambia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity

Slovenia
7.83 t
in 2024
Zambia
5.05 t
in 2009
Slovenia rank
79th
Zambia rank
81st

Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity over time

  • Slovenia
  • Zambia
0100200300400500200220132024

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 7.83 t against 5.05 t in Zambia, a difference of 2.78 t.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zambia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 81st of 98 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity, Slovenia or Zambia?
Slovenia, at 7.83 t against 5.05 t in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity between Slovenia and Zambia?
2.78 t, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Zambia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.
How do Slovenia and Zambia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export quantity?
Slovenia ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 81st of 98 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
129 places, 2,275 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf