Chile vs Ecuador: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Chile
- Ecuador
How they compare
Chile currently reports 418.22 1000 USD against 348.45 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 69.77 1000 USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 39th and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 98 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,751 1000 USD | 23.88 1000 USD | 8,727 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 2,981 1000 USD | 17.52 1000 USD | 2,964 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2020s | 5,336 1000 USD | 193.85 1000 USD | 5,142 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Chile or Ecuador?
- Chile, at 418.22 1000 USD against 348.45 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Chile and Ecuador?
- 69.77 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Chile ranks 39th and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf