Italy vs Romania: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Italy
- Romania
How they compare
Italy currently reports 3,304 1000 USD against 2,265 1000 USD in Romania, a difference of 1,039 1000 USD.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.5 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 15th and Romania ranks 17th of 98 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 980.24 1000 USD | 128.07 1000 USD | 852.17 1000 USD | Italy |
| 2020s | 1,623 1000 USD | 1,451 1000 USD | 172.89 1000 USD | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Italy or Romania?
- Italy, at 3,304 1000 USD against 2,265 1000 USD in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Italy and Romania?
- 1,039 1000 USD, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Romania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Romania rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Italy ranks 15th and Romania ranks 17th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf