Latvia vs Peru: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value over time
- Latvia
- Peru
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 23.26 1000 USD against 16.7 1000 USD in Peru, a difference of 6.56 1000 USD.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Peru ahead.
Latvia ranks 70th and Peru ranks 73rd of 98 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.06 1000 USD | 30.45 1000 USD | 25.4 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2010s | 1.91 1000 USD | 41.69 1000 USD | 39.78 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2020s | 29.95 1000 USD | 54.36 1000 USD | 24.41 1000 USD | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value, Latvia or Peru?
- Latvia, at 23.26 1000 USD against 16.7 1000 USD in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value between Latvia and Peru?
- 6.56 1000 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Peru rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — export value?
- Latvia ranks 70th and Peru ranks 73rd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf