Albania vs Argentina: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Albania
- Argentina
How they compare
Albania currently reports 62.1 t against 53.4 t in Argentina, a difference of 8.7 t.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 111th and Argentina ranks 114th of 194 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Argentina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 300.73 t | 1,545 t | 1,244 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 310.04 t | 3,759 t | 3,449 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 29.9 t | 1,792 t | 1,762 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Albania or Argentina?
- Albania, at 62.1 t against 53.4 t in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Albania and Argentina?
- 8.7 t, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Argentina?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Albania and Argentina rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Albania ranks 111th and Argentina ranks 114th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf