Albania vs Belarus: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Albania
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 74.55 t against 62.1 t in Albania, a difference of 12.45 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 111th and Belarus ranks 109th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 2 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 300.73 t | 19.42 t | 281.31 t | Albania |
| 2010s | 310.04 t | 14.57 t | 295.47 t | Albania |
| 2020s | 29.9 t | 39.08 t | 9.18 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Albania or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 74.55 t against 62.1 t in Albania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Albania and Belarus?
- 12.45 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Belarus?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Albania and Belarus rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Albania ranks 111th and Belarus ranks 109th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf