Australia vs Italy: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Australia
- Italy
How they compare
Australia currently reports 10,435 t against 9,005 t in Italy, a difference of 1,430 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Italy ahead.
Australia ranks 30th and Italy ranks 33rd of 194 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35,649 t | 16,013 t | 19,636 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 14,707 t | 2,947 t | 11,760 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 16,742 t | 6,315 t | 10,427 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Australia or Italy?
- Australia, at 10,435 t against 9,005 t in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Australia and Italy?
- 1,430 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Italy?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Italy rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Australia ranks 30th and Italy ranks 33rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf