Austria vs Viet Nam: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Austria
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 8,232 t against 5,639 t in Austria, a difference of 2,593 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.5 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Austria ranks 38th and Viet Nam ranks 35th of 194 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22,618 t | 37,313 t | 14,696 t | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 15,729 t | 16,673 t | 944.1 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 9,881 t | 10,884 t | 1,003 t | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Austria or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 8,232 t against 5,639 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Austria and Viet Nam?
- 2,593 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Viet Nam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Viet Nam rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Austria ranks 38th and Viet Nam ranks 35th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf