Bahrain vs Saint Lucia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Bahrain
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 1.05 t against 1 t in Bahrain, a difference of 0.05 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Bahrain's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 168th and Saint Lucia ranks 166th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110.62 t | 3.12 t | 107.5 t | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 0.6967 t | 1.17 t | 0.4767 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Bahrain or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 1.05 t against 1 t in Bahrain as of 2017.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Bahrain and Saint Lucia?
- 0.05 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Saint Lucia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Bahrain and Saint Lucia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Bahrain ranks 168th and Saint Lucia ranks 166th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf