Barbados vs Latvia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Barbados
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 47.82 t against 37.85 t in Barbados, a difference of 9.97 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 123rd and Latvia ranks 120th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 206.53 t | 361.16 t | 154.64 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 98.98 t | 86.36 t | 12.61 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 18.05 t | 70.93 t | 52.88 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Barbados or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 47.82 t against 37.85 t in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Barbados and Latvia?
- 9.97 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Latvia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Latvia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Barbados ranks 123rd and Latvia ranks 120th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf