Belgium vs Myanmar: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Belgium
24,572 t
in 2024
Myanmar
24,246 t
in 2024
Belgium rank
17th
Myanmar rank
18th
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Belgium
- Myanmar
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 24,572 t against 24,246 t in Myanmar, a difference of 326 t.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 17th and Myanmar ranks 18th of 194 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,401 t | 168.25 t | 17,233 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 14,979 t | 5,681 t | 9,298 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 23,647 t | 11,508 t | 12,139 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Belgium or Myanmar?
- Belgium, at 24,572 t against 24,246 t in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Belgium and Myanmar?
- 326 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Myanmar?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Myanmar rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Belgium ranks 17th and Myanmar ranks 18th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf