Botswana vs Kyrgyzstan: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Botswana
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 71.06 t against 54.44 t in Botswana, a difference of 16.62 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 113th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 110th of 194 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 356.79 t | 2.35 t | 354.44 t | Botswana |
| 2020s | 307.66 t | 24.71 t | 282.95 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Botswana or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 71.06 t against 54.44 t in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Botswana and Kyrgyzstan?
- 16.62 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kyrgyzstan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Botswana ranks 113th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 110th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf