Bulgaria vs Tunisia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Bulgaria
- Tunisia
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 572.05 t against 483.45 t in Tunisia, a difference of 88.6 t.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tunisia ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 73rd of 181 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 976.62 t | 665.92 t | 310.7 t | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 223.86 t | 283.11 t | 59.26 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 377.81 t | 853.09 t | 475.28 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Bulgaria or Tunisia?
- Bulgaria, at 572.05 t against 483.45 t in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Bulgaria and Tunisia?
- 88.6 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Tunisia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Tunisia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Bulgaria ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 73rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf