Cambodia vs Denmark: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Cambodia
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 23,571 t against 20,237 t in Cambodia, a difference of 3,334 t.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Denmark ahead.
Cambodia ranks 22nd and Denmark ranks 19th of 194 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.41 t | 16,266 t | 16,248 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 6,589 t | 10,313 t | 3,724 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 21,869 t | 49,889 t | 28,021 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Cambodia or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 23,571 t against 20,237 t in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Cambodia and Denmark?
- 3,334 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Denmark?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Denmark rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Cambodia ranks 22nd and Denmark ranks 19th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf