Canada vs Guatemala: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Canada
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 114,962 t against 92,882 t in Canada, a difference of 22,080 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 5th and Guatemala ranks 4th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72,446 t | 67,220 t | 5,226 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 72,401 t | 89,308 t | 16,907 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 96,852 t | 83,975 t | 12,877 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Canada or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 114,962 t against 92,882 t in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Canada and Guatemala?
- 22,080 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Guatemala?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Guatemala rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Canada ranks 5th and Guatemala ranks 4th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf