Chile vs Mozambique: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Chile
- Mozambique
How they compare
Chile currently reports 4,120 t against 3,033 t in Mozambique, a difference of 1,087 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Mozambique's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 47th and Mozambique ranks 50th of 194 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45,063 t | 608.7 t | 44,454 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 29,267 t | 3,936 t | 25,331 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 12,314 t | 4,019 t | 8,294 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Chile or Mozambique?
- Chile, at 4,120 t against 3,033 t in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Chile and Mozambique?
- 1,087 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mozambique?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Mozambique rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Chile ranks 47th and Mozambique ranks 50th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf