Chile vs Pakistan: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity over time
- Chile
- Pakistan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 4,120 t against 3,164 t in Pakistan, a difference of 956 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 47th and Pakistan ranks 49th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46,790 t | 36,342 t | 10,448 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 29,267 t | 29,798 t | 530.91 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 10,675 t | 11,202 t | 527.71 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity, Chile or Pakistan?
- Chile, at 4,120 t against 3,164 t in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity between Chile and Pakistan?
- 956 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Pakistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Pakistan rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import quantity?
- Chile ranks 47th and Pakistan ranks 49th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf